The time Scarlett Johansson chose SodaStream over Oxfam: A controversy revisited

There are moments in the glittering world of Hollywood that remain etched in our memories, not for their glamour, but for the controversies they ignite. One such event was Scarlett Johansson’s bold decision to end her eight-year ambassadorial stint with Oxfam in 2014. Today, we look back at that defining moment when the Avengers star faced a crossroads of principles and affiliations. Scarlett’s association with SodaStream, a fizzy drinks company owning a factory in an Israeli settlement in the West Bank, led to sharp criticisms and growing unease among activists. But what truly fanned the flames was Johansson’s scheduled appearance in an advert for the brand during the coveted NFL Super Bowl halftime. With the advertising slot being the most-watched on US television, all eyes were on Scarlett and her choice of endorsement.

Choosing SodaStream over humanitarianism?

Johansson, ever the stalwart, swiftly defended her association with SodaStream. "She was a 'supporter of economic cooperation and social interaction between a democratic Israel and Palestine'," she said. However, the pressure from campaigners, who felt the position was contradictory to Oxfam's core values, grew insurmountably high.

Also read: Scarlett Johansson talks about dealing with her son's Terrible Twos and Colin Jost's comeback on Saturday Night Live 

A difference of opinion sparks a departure

Scarlett's choice to align with SodaStream created ripples in the humanitarian world. The tension culminated in her decision to step away from Oxfam due to a fundamental difference of opinion in regards to the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. It was a move that showcased her commitment to her beliefs, even when they clashed with those of an organization she had been associated with for almost a decade.

In retrospect, Oxfam's stance was clear. They expressed respect for their ambassadors’ autonomy but emphasized that Scarlett's endorsement of SodaStream contradicted the charity's principles. "Oxfam believes that businesses, such as SodaStream, that operate in settlements further the ongoing poverty and denial of rights of the Palestinian communities we work to support," the charity stated.

Also read: A final bow? Scarlett Johansson's mysterious exit from her Black Widow role

It was a moment of reckoning for Scarlett Johansson, and indeed for all of Hollywood. It forced the industry and its followers to question where they stood on issues of ethics, endorsements, and the lines between personal belief and professional association. As we reminisce about this event, it serves as a poignant reminder of the dilemmas celebrities often face and the choices they must make under the limelight. And while opinions may remain divided, Johansson's unwavering stance during the Oxfam-SodaStream saga remains a testament to her character and conviction.

(Several parts of the text in this article, including the title, were generated with the help of an AI tool.)